Problem:
R1 has both a successor and a Feasible successor for R3 L3 (3.3.3.0/27) and R2 L2 (2.2.2.0/24)
But, when looking at the EIGRP Topology Table for R2 and R3, there isn't a Feasible successor for R3 L3 (3.3.3.0) nor for R2 L2 (2.2.2.0) - what's the deal?!
It's probably due to the feasibility condition
